Flight simulation training technology level and effectiveness evaluation

Abstract: This article compares the level standards of full motion simulators, analyzes the key technologies of visual systems, and establishes a training effectiveness evaluation model.

The full motion simulator needs to meet FAA D-level standards, and the response delay of a six degree of freedom platform for a certain device should be less than 50ms. The visual system adopts LED dome technology, with a brightness of 10000nits and a contrast ratio of 10000:1 for a certain device. Training effectiveness evaluation requires the establishment of a three-dimensional model of "manipulation accuracy decision speed situational awareness". Evaluation data from a certain institution shows that simulated training can reduce real flight training time by 30%.

In terms of technological innovation, machine learning algorithms can generate personalized training scenarios, and a certain system dynamically adjusts the difficulty coefficient based on student performance. The FQM (Flight Quality Monitoring) system developed by a certain aviation school can analyze 12 types of control parameters in real time.

Standard analysis: ICAO Doc 9625 stipulates that simulation training time can account for up to 20%, but specific conditions must be met. Exam focus: Classification of simulator levels and performance evaluation indicators.